Can Google be hacked- | Doctor Android

Google Glass can be hacked using Javascript | Doctor Android ...

Twitter, Facebook, Microsoft. Three major tech companies, all hacked before few weeks… but they’re not alone. Who’s responsible- Why did they do it- We may never learn the reply to these questions, but it surely leads us to wonder whether our dear Google is prone to attack. The mighty “G” has a whole lot of security protocols in place, but are they enough- We must always all be anxious with the safety of our data, so let’s discover just how much we have to concern ourselves in regards to the information we store on Google’s servers.

Who did what to whom-

In situations like this, we’re only given enough info to scare us a piece. Buzzwords like “compromised information” or “accounts hacked” are thrown about, but we rarely gain insight into the how and why. This secrecy is another measure of security, as letting us know the way it was done only invites more hacking. There may be , however, one singular thread running through all this fabric of new hacking activity.


When 250,000 user accounts are compromised, people take notice. When an organization can’t reveal information to position minds comfy, people worry. Via a blog post, we learned that Twitter responded within hours, occurring to claim that they weren’t the simplest ones compromised by hacking. While no direct flaw was identified, Twitter seemed keen to say Java repeatedly, pointing to a Department of Homeland Security warning about Java.


Another recent target for hackers was Facebook, which came forward to recognize being hacked after Twitter, though their attack happened a month prior. Facebook claimed “no evidence that Facebook user data was compromised” while also stating that they were breached through a safety vulnerability in Java. We’re beginning to see a trend, here.


Maybe the foremost tight-lipped of the 3, Microsoft would only say they experienced an analogous hacking instance. They’d go directly to say that some computers were “infected by malicious software using techniques corresponding to those documented by similar organizations.” Microsoft also claimed that no user data was compromised. That’s three big tech companies, and one Java mess.

The others

Apple, The recent York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post. All allegedly hacked, and all allude to Java because the issue. That Department of Defense vulnerability note mentioned earlier notes right here:

By convincing a user to go to a specially crafted HTML document, a remote attacker could possibly execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable system. Note that applications that use the web Explorer websites rendering components, inclusive of Microsoft Office or Windows Desktop Search, can be used as an attack vector for this vulnerability.

The report goes directly to talk about that the safety manager in Java has a flaw which permits a safety exception, allowing malicious users and software. This may then allow unprivileged Java code to access restricted classes. Let’s even be clear that this security flaw affects the machine, not the complete network, per se.

Are all of us in danger-

To determine the reply, let’s first define what “security” and “risk” are. If in case you have access to high-value information, you’re in danger. Once we hear such things as 1 / 4 million Twitter accounts was compromised, that’s probably as a result of a “smash and grab” job by hackers greater than the knowledge of 250,000 people being targetted. They get everything they’re able to before they’re locked out, which ends up in a high variety of “compromised” accounts. In a broader sense, we’re all in danger. If a hacker wants information, they’ll have the option to get it.

Security is a little more difficult to define. While it’s clear that Java is a controversy, it could be turned off. Does that suddenly make your machine secure- It relieves the Java threat, but that